Viewing entries in
Comedy

1 Comment

Chicago Improv Summer: Confidence

4707338 A51968D6Ab photo by *Jake via Flickr Today we started putting the pieces together and went on a little emotional low-high streak. We learned an opening called "The Invocation," did a 30 minute version of "The Armando" and played a cool game just before the end of class that tested all sorts of coordination. After three days of intensive, all-day improv, we've done "six weeks" in real time terms. Well, there went our confidence Day 2 was all about us reporting on how we felt after our scenes, and most of us were really critical. Jessica actually complained about it, saying we were doing amazing work and should be more confident. Last night, several of us joked about showing up this morning and just being a bunch of arrogant bastards, but by lunchtime, we lost all that bravado. The structure the long form improvisation done at the Improv Olympic is called "The Harold." The shows last about 30 minutes and consist of several parts, starting with a theme, word, place or some other such input from the audience. Step one for the players is to build a three to five minute "opening" which is designed to take that word (let's say it's a "spatula") and get at its full meaning. As teacher Jessica would say, "it's to turn that 'pebble' into The Universe... to turn 'vibrator' into Women's Lib." Improv groups use all sorts of methods to explore the meaning of the spatula, from songs to weird contortionism. Jessica taught us a method called "The Invocation," and it has four phases.
  1. IT IS. In phase one, members of the group describe what they see in response to the word/object suggested. The description is precise, and it builds cumulatively. So, if the word is notebook, and person A says "it is a three ring binder," person B says, "it is completely red," person C is NOT allowed to say it's a blue Dell "notebook" computer. The group builds a common, physical definition together.
  2. YOU ARE. In phase two, we each make a personal connection to the suggestion. These do not have to build or be consistent across the players. I might say (to the object itself), "You are where I kept my life goals."
  3. THOU ART. This phase is similar to "YOU ARE" but rather than being personal, it's meant to be metaphorical or philosophical. For example, building on the personal YOU ARE, I might say (to the object), "thou art a dreamcatcher."
  4. I AM. Finally, we become the object. With I AM, we look for one word or phrase that captures the essence of the suggestion. "I am hope," I might say as the notebook.
Again, the point of the exercise is to avoid having a show that spends 30 minutes talking about a friggin notebook, because no one wants to see that. The would, however, be interested in a story about a GM line employee who kept a secret file with plans for improvements to the company's cars that he plans to sell to Toyota, for example. We played around with the invocation, and worked up to building actual scenes based on our inspiration, but the scenes sucked. We got trapped within certain themes way to easily, and Jessica sent us off to lunch with a pretty heavy and on point set of critiques encouraging us to push farther. In my own scene, I know I walked into it having forgotten the wants and needs lesson of Day 2. I was fixed on a character who was homeless, but he had no motivation or desires, so the scene went nowhere. Others in the class had different challenges, but the point was that our scenes were not nearly as inspired as our opening invocation had set them up to be. There must have been something in my meatball sub because I and the rest of the class returned and, man, we killed the second half of class! The Armando Diaz Experience Armando Diaz is a real man who lives today in NYC, running his own theatre at The Magnet. He has a longform improv style named after him, referred to as "The Armando." Like the Harold, you build scenes based on inspiration, and Jessica explained that "the Armando" is just another source of inspiration. Rather than having an opening (in the form of an invocation, perhaps) and all the other structures of the Harold, the Armando is built around a monologue.
  1. Audience provides suggestion
  2. A monologist (referred to as the Armando) tells a TRUE story related to the suggestion. He stops after a minute or two
  3. Players create scenes inspired by the audience suggestion and the story of the Armando. They comment on the story
  4. When the scenes feel exhausted, the Armando returns with another story, possibly integrating themes from the previous scenes
  5. More scenes
  6. Another monologue
  7. this could go on forever, but it doesn't. Eventually, the Armando gives a final monologue which tries to touch on many of the subsequent themes raised in the scenes.
Some important points: The monologues need to be true, maybe a bit exaggerated, but not just made up. It's really hard to just make up a story on the fly. That's the job of the players in the scenes. Also, the scenes that are built, should not just be a visual replay of the story. This isn't Charlie Murphy stories on Chappelle. Like with the Invocation, we explore what the real meaning of the story is behind the actual words used. I told a story of my constant running in middle school. One day, I was chasing a friend of mine and he leapt over a chain-linked fence onto a steep hill. I followed but didn't quite clear the top chain, clipped my right foot and busted my ass in front of a whole bunch of friends and cute girls who all laughed at me. That story isn't about jumping over that fence. It could be about many things, though. It could be about embarrassment. It could be about not finishing something you started. It could be about the price of trying to be like someone else. We did this for thirty minutes, with multiple monologues and scenes and didn't realize at all how much time had passed. We were inspired, and that was the point. Jessica's bomb ass quote of the day: "We can get inspiration from anywhere. Be inspired by everything." That reminds me. On September 7, I'll be taking part in a show that follows this theme. It's called Stand-Uprov, and will be a the Improv Asylum in Boston. New York has it's own version called Stand-prov. The premise is the same, though. A standup comic performs his set (or MONOLOGUE :)) and the improv players build scenes around that story, commenting on what was really being said. I don't have time to describe the closing game, but it was mad fun. Today was another incredible improv-y experience. We sort of sucked in the morning, but we killed in the afternoon. Thanks Jessica and all the cats on the team! I'm off to find Drinking Liberally in Chicago.

1 Comment

Comment

Chicago Improv Summer: Ok, this is scary

photo by aphasiafilms via Flickr Day 2 of my Improv Olympic summer intensive focused on interactive monologues and character wants and needs. Today went by so very fast, so I know it was a good one. A Scene is Like a Road Trip In the morning, we spent almost the entire time doing what are called "interactive monologues." In this case, three people sit on stage in chairs facing the audience. They're lined up in a single row, and are supposed to begin a conversation with a non-existent person based on an audience suggestions which are different for each speaker. There's no chosen order to speak, so the first person starts whenever, and the second one begins when it feels right. The second speaker's one-sided conversation is inspired by the audience suggestion and the first speaker. The same is true of the third who is inspired by both prior speakers and his own audience suggestion. Then our fearless teacher Jessica has the three speakers turn to face each other, continuing their disparate conversations but this time interacting directly with the other speakers on the stage as if they were involved in a direct conversation. Everyone thinks they are talking to the people on the stage, but we all interpret the words a bit differently based on our own personal conversations. Here's an example. I was given the term "Rocket" to build my conversation. I made the conversation be between me, a night club promoter, convincing people to come in and see the headlining band, "Rockit!" The club was in the Sahara Desert for some reason. Later, when the three speakers turned in to face each other, another woman was having her conversation about her baby and said something to me about how she didn't want her kid to die. I explained that I was saying the band, Rockit, was "KILLER." I'm not doing the exercise justice, but it was amazing to see how a group of people talking about very different things could 1) use themes from others' conversations to enhance their own and 2) talk directly to each other without quite talking to each other. On some level, we were all talking about the same thing. Jessica also passed on a great advice from a talented improver named Joe Bill. It's about exploring the nooks and crannies of a scene but making sure you somehow stick to the underlying plot line. His take was this: A scene is like a road trip. You need to leave the road occasionally for gas, food, etc. But you have to remember where you were going and eventually get back on the road. Good advice. The second game we played was a twist on a more common one. The common version has you focus on your pet peeves with "I hate X because..." Instead we played "I love X because..." Show. Don't Tell. The final game was mos def the illest! The setup was two people who each has a want/need/desire to be fulfilled by the other. The trick is they can't just tell the other person what they want. Their characters need to communicate it be creating a relationship and showing the other, such that person two figures it out and gives it to them... or chooses not to. Two people got on stage reached to pull a piece of paper from a cup. They would then turn those papers over to Jessica who sent the to the bathroom. She clued the rest of the class/audience in on what their secret wants were, then brought the two players back out. The matchups of secret wants was hilarious at times. In one case, person A wanted to be talked out of suicide and person B wanted someone to confide in him. In my own case, I wanted a hug and my partner, Leanne, wanted to know the meaning of life. Each pair was given a location as well. Ours was a weight room. This exercise was the height of my improv experience so far. I felt very lost within the scene, having a hard time balancing my attention between listening to Leanne and figuring out what relationship we had that could make her want to hug me. By the end she was expressing complete sympathy and we had moved really close to each other. I put on one of the saddest faces ever, with Jessica saying it was a high moment in HER improv experience, but I didn't get the hug. I also wasn't really sure I knew what Leanne wanted. When the scene was over, the entire audience was pretty amazed because we both had essentially gotten what we needed, if not in a literal way, a very close approximation. I got an emotional hug from Leanne who did everything except wrap her arms around me. And in talking with her, she got from me some deeper understanding of the universe and energy. I had, apparently, come quite close to satisfying her need as well. Watching and being a part of this game honestly scared the hell out of me because it shouldn't work. We demonstrated that humans communicate with one another on a subconscious level, to say the least. What we can't put into precise words, we put into body language, emotion and indirect words. Somehow, we are able to connect with others in a way that builds mutual understanding. If this had happened one or two times, I would have thought it was neat, but it happened seven times with different needs and different people. This work is so inspiring.

Comment

3 Comments

Chicago Improv Summer: "She promised me her lawyer money."

photo by strzelecki1 via Flickr As many of you know, I'm in Chicago this summer, primarily to study improvisational comedy with the good folks of Improv Olympic. I'll try to blog a lot about what I'm learning, what's cool, what's weird and whatever else I can think of. As always, if you have comments or questions or things you want to hear about, hollaback in the comments. Day 1. I'm seven minutes late. I don't know what made me think that I could visit any government office and be out in 10 minutes, but I assure you, that will never happen again. I spent Sunday night researching the best way to get around town. It was my plan to keep the car parked as much as possible and experience the L. However, I still had to decide what sort of pass I would get. I settled on an unlimited 30 day joint called the Chicago Card Plus, and headed downtown because you have to buy these in person. There were about 15 people in front of me in line, and the workers behind the glass (I'm SURE it's bullet proof, and after waiting 40 minutes, I'm SURE I know why) had absolutely no focus. They would deal with someone in front of them for a minute, then take a call, then talk amongst themselves and repeat that cycle. I waited in the actual line for maybe 20 - 25 minutes. When I got to a window, she gave me some paper form to fill out. Why weren't those available to fill out why I was waiting?? Because that makes too much damned good sense, that's why! So I filled out the form, handed it to the attendant, only to have her type in exactly what I wrote down. Yo, I could have done that myself! I finally got the card at 10:45, and class starts at 11am. I was downtown, and class is up by Wrigley Field. I took a cab. $20. Thus negating MUCH of the savings of the pass I had just bought. Day 1: I'm a genius I rolled in a few minutes late but in time to hear the last part of iO co-founder Charna Halpern's kickoff speech. "Improv is a thinking man's game. It's like chess. You are all geniuses." I like this gig already. You should read a little more about the iO over here or here, but the basics are that this school focuses on improv just for the art of it, not as a tool to create sketch comedy, for example. Some notable alumni include Tina Fey (oooh la la), STEPHEN COLBERT, Tim Meadows and Chris Farley. There are between 40 and 50 people in the summer program, divided into three sessions. I'm in session one with 13 other people from all over the place. Steve is from London. Karen is from Boise, Idaho. Eric is from Holland. Sarah and her brother, Nick, are from Ottawa. There are even a few New Yorkers. Our fearless teacher for Week 1 is Jessica. We spent the day doing what I can only describe as playing, and it was mad fun. Jessica gave us increasing amounts of freedom in our two-person scene work throughout the day. In the beginning, she told us who our characters were, and she told us when to stop the scene. By the end of the day, we were deciding both all on our own. Day 1: Highlights The day focused a lot on connections and character relationships. We did exercises that forced us to eavesdrop on others' conversations while being engaged in our own so we could learn to pay attention to what's happening on stage and integrate it into our own actions. We were thrown into alien situations with a scene partner and had to instantly demonstrate a history and explore the meaning of that relationship. here are some of the cool, weird, funny and interesting things I remember.
  • I was thrown into a scene where me and a guy named Jeff were showing up at the same house to pick up the same woman for a date. Jeff's first statement to me: "are you here to deliver something?" "Yes I am. I'm here to deliver flowers for my date tonight." Later in the scene, Jeff mentioned that he saw our date (Laura) in line at the unemployment office. "That's disappointing," I said. "Why?" "Because she promised me a lot of her lawyer money." "What's that?" "Well, Laura works at a pretty unique law firm. They have clients and documents and stuff, but they also have a big pile of lawyer money, and she was going to give some to me." I have no idea what I was talking about, but it was fun!
  • An election for president of a sixth grade class led to riots in the school and chewing gum in all the kids' hair
  • A daughter was forced by her overly stringent mother to fax her mom the pizza order from downstairs so her mom could review it
Alright. I'm tired, and you know what? You weren't there, so this might read really dumb. The point is, I learned a shit ton, including the fact the people actually SAY "shit ton." I'll report more from My Chicago Summer as soon as possible. Stay tuned.

3 Comments

2 Comments

Announcing Baratunde's New York Times Bestselling Book(cover)s!

In America's charged political atmosphere, the level of acrimony seems to know no bounds. Nowhere is this more clear than in the publishing industry, where books from the Right accuse liberals of everything from having mental disorders to being extremist, pro-death, godless, slandering traitors. Authors such as Ramesh Ponnuru and Ann Coulter have lowered the political discourse with baseless charges and, in the process, raised their income and speaking fees. Well, it's time the Left fought back.

Comedian, author and vigilante pundit Baratunde Thurston is proud to answer these accusations with the release of his bestselling book covers. These empty volumes are the perfect response to the disingenuous, unsubstantiated and sometimes laughable accusations from so-called right wing "pundits." The fact that many of these people are household names is an insult to those who have worked hard to earn that position, namely Paris Hilton and TomKat's baby.

Responding to America's short attention span, Baratunde's publisher has decided to skip straight to the merchandising phase, foregoing printing of the actual "book."

Get your bestselling book cover t-shirt now!


Kittens For BreakfastKITTENS FOR BREAKFAST:
AND OTHER DELICIOUS RECIPES FROM THE CONSERVATIVE KITCHEN

With a new chapter on Senator Bill "Kitten-Killer" Frist!

Excerpts:

"And that's when it occurred to them! Baby seal blubber would really enhance their Independence Day bunny burgers."

   - Chapter 36, "Killed on the 4th of July"


The 700 Club Gangbanged My PuppyTHE 700 CLUB GANGBANGED MY PUPPY

They've called for the assassination of elected foreign leaders. They've blamed feminists for 9/11, and homosexuals for Hurricane Katrina. They said Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon was struck down because he failed to adhere to biblical prophecy. In this never-before-told story, find out where this very special club gets its strength: the buttholes of virgin puppies. Because it's not gay if your partner is a dog.

Endorsements:

"Of course! It all makes sense now."

   - a former member of Jerry Falwell's Moral Majority Coalition

*** Don't forget to check out the alternate cover! ***


Conservatives Haven't Denied Creating AIDSCONSERVATIVES HAVEN'T DENIED CREATING AIDS:
Bill Frist's Secret Plan to Spread the Disease with his Sweaty Hands:
And why I want Rick Santorum to meet him

Consider the evidence:

  1. We have no conclusive proof on the origin of the HIV virus which causes AIDS.
  2. It's well known that conservatives have launched a new effort to reach out to traditional Democratic voters, which include homosexuals and African-Americans.
  3. Political campaigns generally include handshaking with key civil rights leaders.
  4. In a 2004 interview, Republican Senator Bill Frist, a licensed doctor, claimed he "didn't know" if HIV-AIDS could be transmitted by sweat.

Well, the conclusion is clear. The STD-ridden, kitten-killing, puppy-banging wing of the conservative movement created AIDS. If they didn't, then why don't they say so?

Endorsements:

"Baratunde Thurston has uncovered the most frightening secret in America. He should be awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor, a Purple Heart and 30 years on the lucrative lecture circuit."



Finally, against all odds, we tracked down Ann Cooter's tortured conscience, which managed to sneak away long enough to give us this inside scoop.

Husbandless by Ann CooterHUSBANDLESS:
Whine, Screech, 9/11, Buy My Book
by Ann Cooter

She's made a lucrative career of blaming liberals for every failing in society. Now, in her first honest work, Ann Cooter tells all about her loneliness, her lies and her selfish motives.

Endorsements:

"It made me feel sorry for her. Cooter's story made me want to give her a hug... after punching her in the Adam's apple, of course."

   - a reader

"This broad is a millionaire, lionized on TV and in articles about her, reveling in her status as a celebrity and stalked by neo-Nazis. I've never seen someone enjoying other's deaths so much."

   - the 9/11 widows


Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

2 Comments

3 Comments

No Boston Comedy Festival for me!

I love the sadness of it all. I've been doing standup for four years, here in Boston, but I won't be doing the 2006 Boston Comedy Festival. I blew the deadline!

I missed the event last year due to I-don't-even-know-what. They had changed the event to much later in the year. This year, it wasn't even on me radar. Then, last Thursday night, as I'm preparing for the big Laughing Liberally show at Jimmy Tingle's Theatre, I caught a screenfull of Sean McCarthy's blog (and bigup to the Herald for running Wordpress!) saying that day was the deadline.

I thought I could rush it in and beg. I found a really good set of mine on DVD (from my April 7 Comedy Central audition -- they haven't called BTW), and found that the disc was bad! I finally got a good version last night, and whipped open iMovie to do a quick edit, but iMovie was mad at me or something -- lots of audio glitches. So, I manned up and faced my fear: Final Cut Pro.

I added a little title, upped the gamma (since the club lighting SUCKED on the DVD) and let it process overnight. This morning, I pumped that bad boy into iDVD and burned. Then it was off to work, where I skipped out early, RAN to the subway station, just making the train. I got off in Harvard Square where I RAN to the bus, barely making it. Over to Allston I rolled to hand-deliver the submission and beg for forgiveness. I didn't even know if the building would be open after 5pm, but it was!

Up the stairs I ran, down the all, and another hall, and another damn hall, knocked on the door. "Come in!" Yes, people were there!

In I went, looking sad and sweaty, "Hey it's probably too late, but I've been out of town so much recently and just found out about the deadline."

"Sorry. It's too late."

Damn.

You'd think they would notify past participants of the submission dates coming up, send out a MySpace bulletin or something, but in the end, it was my own damned fault. Unlike the President, I take responsibility for my failures.

Hopefully, I'll get into the New York Underground Comedy Festival, which happens at the same time. In fact, I'm probably gonna submit to every comedy festival in the damn country over the next year.

YOU HEAR THAT AMERICA!!! I'M COMING!!!!

3 Comments

4 Comments

i have 5 free tix to Laughing Liberally. claim them! (update: all gone)

thursday 7:30pm = 2 tickets
friday 7:30pm = 1 ticket
saturday 7:30pm = 2 tickets

leave a comment here.
i will confirm with you via email.

Update 11:37 pm

See previous blog post for full details.
show is in Somerville MA

Jimmy Tingle's Off Broadway Theatre
255 Elm St, Somerville, MA 02144

Update 1:10 am

Saturday is down to 1 ticket

Update 12:25 pm June 15

all tickets are gone. the rest of you suckas, PAY UP!

4 Comments