Archive for September, 2007
Originally published in Baratunde’s bi-weekly GOODCRIMETHINK column in the September 26, 2007 edition of Boston’s Weekly Dig. Click through to see the awesome graphic the Dig created!
And now, back to our war.
Last week, the Iraqi government said it was going to cancel the license of Blackwater USA for allegedly killing 11 civilians in a gun battle surrounding an official’s convoy. I smiled when I saw the headlines and thought, “Oh, isn’t that cute? The Iraqi government thinks it can govern.”
There are just over 160,000 US military personnel in Iraq and 180,000 private contractors, including up to 50,000 employed in “security” functions. Blackwater is one of the most important to the American government. The State Department has a large contract with them, as does the Defense Department. They’re so close that when the secretary of defense visits Iraq, he is protected by Blackwater forces, not the US military. Given the elderly, criminal and mentally unstable (but, by God, not gay) recruits the Pentagon has been desperately snagging lately, I can understand the decision. With all this, the idea that Blackwater can simply leave Iraq will remain just that: an idea.
Didn’t anyone tell the Iraqi officials that private security contractors were explicitly granted immunity from Iraqi law back in 2004? Didn’t anyone tell the Iraqi officials that they cannot “revoke” Blackwater’s license because all evidence suggests the company has been operating without a license since 2006 or earlier? Really, what does the Iraqi prime minister talk about with US officials who constantly drop in for surprise visits, Bill Belichick’s intelligence apparatus?
“But,” many of my left-leaning friends say, “they’re mercenaries!”
OK, just what is a mercenary? Critics argue that the private contractors are only fighting for the money, but why else would you be in Iraq? Freedom? Democracy? Hummus? If money is the true motivation, then be prepared to call that American kid enticed by the Army’s $25,000 “Quick Ship” signing bonus a mercenary, too. With the entire US occupation based on America’s need for oil and the money flowing from it, we are all mercenaries.
Besides, mercenaries are not always a bad thing. Do me a favor, and watch The Devil Came on Horseback, a film about the genocide in Darfur. After you’re done watching the mass displacement, rape and slaughter, and after you’ve heard the latest resolution-without-action from the UN and US politicians, tell me you don’t want to send in some hard Blackwater guys to take down the Janjaweed immediately. I will help you raise the money myself.
Blackwater is not the problem. It is a symptom. It is a symptom of a rush to war on the cheap and without proper planning. It is a symptom of our bias toward privatization combined with a failure to establish clear rules for just who these private contractors are accountable to.
It is easy to look at this most recent Blackwater incident and blame private contractors for all the problems surrounding them in Iraq, but these companies are, after all, contractors. This means somebody contracted with them to do their work. Demanding that Blackwater leave the country was as far as the Iraqis could go. They’d be hard-pressed to find, much less cancel the license of, the US government.
BARATUNDE THURSTON IS A COMEDIAN AND AUTHOR. HIS COLUMN RUNS BIWEEKLY. CATCH HIM PERFORMING AT THE BOSTON COMEDY FESTIVAL NEXT WEEK. FOR DETAILS, VISIT BARATUNDE.COM.
cross-posted to Jack & Jill Politics
Eddie Griffin posted in the comments of my original post that What About Our Daughters had some great coverage of yesterday’s hearings. After reviewing their ridiculously good coverage, I need to give a phat shout to What About Our Daughters (WAOD). Even if you watched the live web stream, their perspective is unique and valuable.
I thought I’d pull out some links to make it more accessible to yall. I’ve done some selective quoting to give you a flavor of the highlights.
When you click through to the articles, you’ll have to scroll down past a large header before you get to the main blog post. Just a heads up. BTW, these posts are in chronological order. If you want to see the full live blogging set over at WAOD, just click here. I love bloggers man. Talk about democratization of media. This is a shining example right here.
WAOD Live Blogging From Imus to Industry Hearings in Washington,DC- Witness List Up(SMH) _ Rev. Al Gotta be MAD!
Master P and Levell Crump( Open mind. Must. Keep. An. Open. Mind.(repeat))
Y’all know Rev. Al is TICKED that his arch nemesis, David Banner is speaking before Congress.
I’m in the hearing rom by the skin of my teeth
We were in line since 8:00 but barely got into the hearing room because Viacom brought about 50 lobbyists and the entertainment companies brought HUGE groups of people with them. ONLY 25 people in the line that had been there since 8:00AM got in. The room was already filled when we got in. Apparently WE ended up in the section reserved for the press so this female staffer in a black suit and a green silk shirt keeps giving us the STANK eye and I keep giving it back!
Blogger Eddie Griffin and Afrospear Get a Shout out in the hearing! - EDDIES’s Statement in Full( BELOW)
YAY Eddie! Congressman Burgess read your e-mail in the hearing room.
…
Hell we are over an hour in and the congresspeople are STILL talking. Couldn’t they all just STIPULATE that they A) aren’t in favor of Censorship and B) Folks can get a V-chip
Viacom uses Hearings to Promote BET Show “HIp Hop Versus America”
SHAMELESS Plug. Viacom is the Devil. Shameless. They made us sit through a commercial of BET in the House of the People! Bought and paid for. Shecodes is having a fit next to me. Why didn’t Viacom show a clip from 106 and Park? Why didn’t they show “A Bay Bay”
Celebrity Sightings at Break AND We finally get to the QUESTIONS! _ Its getting hot in here! FINALLY
Ranking Republican member (Stearns) - confronting head of Universal Music with 50 Cent and Cam’ron lyrics. Go get em! I guess the Republicans didn’t get the memo. THAT’S what Viacom gets for not throwing them a reception tonight as part of CBC week. The ranking member is taking it to them. This is what I sat cramped in an airline seat to see. I am loving this!
Congressman Butterfield(NC) is Enraptured with Viacom - just gushing. Viacom CEO says he doesn’t actually keep up with that what they put on the air. Viacom CEO is satisfied with his standards. Salutes Warner Music for the work that they do? Who the hell is this Congressman. He has to be a member of the CBC.
Viacom CEO says Rev. Coates is “Harassing Debra Lee at her Home”
WHY is this sister Congresswomen sitting up on the podium waving a church fan? She
came in late so i don’t know her name yet, but WHY did she pull out a big ole fan waving like she up in a hot church.
…
Viacom is very proud of funding “Hot Ghetto Mess”.
Panel Two - David Banner, Michael Eric Dyson and Master P
David banner looks like that guy from Saturday Night Live , Tracey something. His suit is too tight. David Banner is the Republican Witness.
VIACOM CONTROLS WITNESS LIST! WAOD SCOOP!
I was wondering why folks were passing out flyers up in here.
Panel Two - David Banner College Graduate? Couldn’t tell - Calls Hip Hop “Horror Music”
David Banner defends the “N” Word. Wonders why Steven King and Stephen Spilberg get a pass wants Hip Hop to be considered “Horror Music” Oh lord he is going after Homeland Security now. David Banner’s mama showed up and and applauded at the end of his opening statement.
Panel Three FINALLY Starts - They Should Have Gone First
The hearing room is now empty. Congressmen and women are gone. Most of the Audience that was packed in is gone when perhaps this is the panel most of these folks should have made sure they listened to.
Rush is the only Congressman left to ask questions of Panel 3
Rush is talking out both of the sides of his mouth. He was preening and fawning over the entertainment execs and now he is oozing with empathy for Black women in front of the ONLY PANEL WITH WOMEN on it. Why didn’t he ask the Execs this question?
Post Hearings Reflections - Congress States Definitively “Black Women, Y’all are on Your Own!”
If you thought the hearings were long tedious and boring, you were wrong. What happened on camera was nothing like the circus off camera. Like caribou locking antlers in a battle of a territory, we watched the melodrama of the Black Elite Establishment play out in front of our eyes. It would make you laugh, make you cry, make you want to see it again and again.
The main lesson is the one I pointed out at the beginning of this blog. The negative depiction of Black women is not a matter for Capitol Hill, it is a matter for the capital markets. Its not abotu free speech, but the free market. Its not a constitutional issue, but a customer service issue.
WE DON”T NEED CONGRESS!
Phew. A hat tip doesn’t seem like enough praise to WAOD. How do you get bigger than that? Maybe a gallon hat flip? I’m trippin. Anyway, hope this was helpful.
(cross-posted to Jack & Jill Politics)
A troubling set of Western-initiated forces are aligning to further destabilize Africa.
That Cold War mentality which saw the rich nations of the world treat Africa as a playground and dumping ground is in full effect. Foreign debt is crushing already-struggling economies. A thirst for oil is exacerbating the gap between rich and poor and driving societies further away from freedom. The so-called “War on Terror” has made Africa suddenly interesting to the U.S. military. But the biggest force may be global warming.
According to a report in Time magazine, global warming may be “drowning Africa.”
“This weather is what climatologists predicted, and it is happening even faster than expected,” says Grace Akumu, executive director of the Kenya-based Climate Change Network. “We are overwhelmed.” The immediate consequences of climate change in Africa? Countries will experience either torrential floods or severe drought during a season. Akumu says that the unpredictable climate will threaten the food supply in Africa and potentially eliminate key crops. Africans are expected to face a severe lack of food and drinkable water by the end of the century.
Not all of Africa’s problems can be blamed on the West, but a whole lot can. Global warming is undoubtedly caused by Western industrialized society and its rampant consumerism, but the effects are disproportionately felt by the world’s non-industrialized and poor nations. Adding further insult is the fact that these nations don’t have the resources (financial, technological or otherwise) to combat the effects of global warming in the same way Western societies can.
Push come to shove, the U.S. will probably erect sea walls and pursue other measures to limit social and economic damage from rising sea levels, etc. Most African nations cannot afford such an expense. The Time article continues:
Africa is particularly vulnerable because it has a low institutional capacity to combat the changing weather. As a result, says Ugandan climate change specialist James Magezi-Akiiki, “in Africa, adaptation to climate change is more important than mitigation.” In response to the floods devouring Uganda, Magezi-Akiiki says that the government will now consider the effects of global warming, such as increased rainfall, in its planning of future infrastructure projects.
Ironically, Africa produces far less carbon than other continents, leading some scientists to blame industrialized countries for Africa’s climate plight. Uganda’s President Yoweri Museveni announced at an African Union summit this year that developed countries were “committing aggression” against Africa by causing global warming.
The irony is extra spicy in this case. As our Western societies max out on resources such as energy, we could learn a thing or two from our “third world” brothers and sisters about how to live more in a more sustainable fashion, but we’re too busy exploiting them to see such a possibility. As Africa becomes less stable, we will extend an offer of help, but it will come with major strings attached. We’ll probably repeat the mistakes we made in Latin America all over again, propping up unjust regimes to get ours and get out.
We should all be paying a lot more attention to energy, climate and food issues. I recommend checking out the blog for the African American Environmentalist Association which just posted about an upcoming CBC Foundation event on environmental justice.
(cross-posted to Jack and Jill Politics)
Tip of the hat to Eddie Griffin (no not that one) for the heads up about this. Today, Tuesday September 25th, a House Subommittee will hold a hearing on the following:
From Imus to Industry: The Business of Stereotypes and Degrading Images
Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade, and Consumer Protection Hearing
10:00 a.m. in room 2123 Rayburn House Office Building
you can view the live stream with Windows Media Player starting about 10 minutes before the hearing begins.
Variety, in many ways the official entertainment industry magazine, wrote about the hearings back on September 4th.
A new front on the content wars may be opening when Congress holds its first hearing specifically into media “stereotypes and degradation” of women — particularly African- American women — later this month.
Hearing, not yet officially announced and tentatively skedded for Sept. 25, will focus primarily on hip-hop lyrics and videos, which critics have frequently derided for explicit misogyny aimed largely at black women.
But other media will likely come under scrutiny, too.
“I want to engage not just the music industry but the entertainment industry at large to be part of a solution,” said Rep. Bobby Rush (D-Ill.), chairman of the House Subcommittee on Commerce, Trade and Consumer Protection, which will hold the hearing.
Just as his colleagues on other committees have summoned TV execs to be grilled on sexual or violent content, Rush wants to hear from the leaders of companies purveying rap music. The intent is to examine commercial practices behind the music’s most controversial content.
According to the subcommittee website, the hearings will consist of three panels with a variety of witnesses.
Panel 1 (the c-walkers)
Phillipe P. Dauman, President & CEO, Viacom
Edgar Bronfman, Jr., Chairman & CEO, Warner Music Group
Doug Morris, Chairman & CEO, Universal Music Group
Alfred C. Liggins III, President & CEO, Radio One
Strauss Zelnick, Chairman of the Board, Take-Two Interactive Software (creators of the Grand Theft Auto game franchise)
Panel 2 (the artists)
Percy Miller, aka Master P
Levell Crump, aka David Banner
Panel 3 (the akademiks) I provide links to their bios or books, etc.
Tracy Sharpley-Whiting, PhD @ Vanderbilt
Andrew Rojecki, Phd @ Univ of Illinois Chicago
Faye WIlliams, PhD & Chair Nat’l Congress of Black Women
Lisa Fager Bediako, President of Industry Ears
Karen Dill, PhD @ Lenoi-Rhyne College
This should be very interesting. I won’t be able to tune in, but I hope someone can report back on some highlights.
Congress has a habit of dragging content executives to the Hill when there is a public outcry of inappropriate images, especially where children are the intended audience. Criticisms of the media as a “vast wasteland” date back nearly to the medium’s beginning in former FCC Chairman Newton Minow’s famous 1961 speech.
As an artist and “content creator” myself, I don’t relish the idea of legislation dictating what I can and cannot say, but I’m interested in what this hearing will bring out. The title suggests they will do more than drag a few artists and execs up in order to rub their noses in filthy content. Being about the business of stereotypes, we could see some interesting data on the affects of images and sound on the audience and the profits behind such.
I was in high school when I first saw C. Delores Tucker protesting “gangster rap,” and she honestly irked me to no end. When I saw her, she was rude, mean and didn’t seem to want to listen. I can’t say that’s how she is, but that was my impression and I wanted none of it. Let folks play what they will, I thought. But the marketplace of images isn’t so fairly balanced as to let just the “market” decide, and saying that violent images don’t affect people is plain wrong.
As a friend of mine put it so well once, “there’s a multibillion dollar industry predicated on the idea that images and sound make people do sh*t. It’s called advertising.”
(cross-posted to Jack & Jill Politics)
In case you missed it, here is the audio from the Blogger Roundtable section of NPR’s News & Notes, hosted by Farai Chideya. The show aired Wednesday September 19, 2007 at 1pm Eastern Time. You can also access it on NPR’s website.
Click on the image below to play the show right here.
Bloggers at the table this week were:
lynne and I were in the NYC studio, and I can’t remember where Juliette was. We had originally planned to discuss four topics but had to drop the Juanita Bynum story due to time constraints. The three we did get to were:
Some of my extended thoughts on the topics…
OJ. I have nothing to say about the man. I got two text messages from CNN about his “story” but none about Petraeus, none about Jena.
The GOP. Giving the Heismann to black and brown voters is foolish. What happened to the testosterone-filled manly men of the GOP? Are they afraid of getting tough questions from colored folks, values voters and even YouTubers? I’m a lefty, but I know the truth lies in the middle of so-called Left and Right. I am genuinely interested in how Republicans might propose to seriously address the concerns of black and brown folks. But, if you don’t bring your ideas to the table, you might as well not have any.
Blackwater. This was a tough story for me to get a handle on. I have a knee-jerk liberal-type reaction against privatized security forces, but I reached out to a good friend with some expertise on the matter and found some truly balanced opinions at BlackWaterBlogger.com. Things are rarely as simple as they appear, and definitely more complicated that we want them to be. I also highly recommend Iraq for Sale from Brave New Films.
Thanks to News & Notes and the other bloggers for a good time.
(cross-posted to Jack & Jill Politics)
Why else would this triflin Negro utter such foolishness:
Jackson sharply criticized presidential hopeful and Illinois Sen. Barack Obama for “acting like he’s white” in what Jackson said has been a tepid response to six black juveniles’ arrest on attempted-murder charges in Jena, La. Jackson, who also lives in Illinois, endorsed Obama in March, according to The Associated Press.
“If I were a candidate, I’d be all over Jena,” Jackson said after an hour-long speech at Columbia’s historically black Benedict College.
“Jena is a defining moment, just like Selma was a defining moment,” said the iconic civil rights figure, who worked with Martin Luther King Jr. in the 1965 Selma civil rights movement and was with King at his 1968 assassination.
Yes, Jesse, if you were a candidate, you would be all over Jena. And you’d be all over OJ, counseling him during his grief. You’d be all over Michael Richards, boycotting the Seinfeld Season 7 DVD. You’d be all over alleged rape cases, giving free college tuition to all accusers. That’s the problem, Jesse. You are all over everything, except yourself. You would probably lick your chops at the prospect of an old school Jim Crow terrorist lynching because it would give you a chance to hold a press conference and a march. I really hate to say it, but what else am I supposed to believe?
It is an absolute affront to black people and, hell, humanity, that Jesse Jackson takes his outdated soapbox, rallies around the legitimate injustice that is the Jena 6 and uses it to toss a universally insulting and immature insult at a presidential candidate he has endorsed! If this is how he treats his friends, I’d hate to see what he serves up to his enemies.
This entire Jesse Sharpson / Al Jackston duopoly on black spokesmanship (because it’s definitely not leadership) is played out. Can we get a forced retirement up in here? Are there term limits for embarrassing black leaders? How do you impeach someone who was never elected?
I’m with Oliver Willis. Get me some Deval Patrick or anybody new over this foolish old man.
Seriously Jesse, what’s going on brotha? Mad that Obama might do what you didn’t? Mad that he’s not running the campaign you would run if you were a candidate? Guess what, Jesse. You were a candidate… twice, and you lost… twice. Let it go. And since you’re going for a personal attack against the Obama’s racial authenticity — not to mention attacking all white Americans who stand for racial justice — Reverend, what’s the real problem? Baby mama drama got you down, Reverend?
I’m only asking because the last time I checked, Obama didn’t father any crumb-snatchers with a woman other than his wife. If attacking Barack Obama is how you show that you’re “all over” Jena, I’d rather you stayed away from tomorrow’s protest. Instead, just make sure you’re “all over” those child support payments.
Technorati Tags: Barack Obama, jena 6, jesse jackson, triflin
What’s up fam,
We’re back on News & Notes this Wednesday afternoon, and I’m reaching out to yall for topic suggestions. What’s on your mind from the past week?
- Condi fighting Cheney over diplomacy v. war
- Some hints of justice for the Jena Six
- The snorable Fred Thompson
- Bush’s speech
- Greenspan’s criticism of the Bush administration and backpedalling on the war for oil comment
- Alan Keyes jumping into the race (because somebody has to take on Mike Gravel)
?
Throw em up on the comments.
Update 17th September at 11:34pm
That’s what I get for blogging from a plane about to depart. I forgot to mention the other bloggers on the show!
Juliette Orteing of Baldilocks
and
lynne d johnson of herself
I have been in Chicago for a few days and make a habit of picking up the Chicago Reader, an incredible alt weekly reminding me of the best of Boston’s Weekly Dig and the Village Voice.
After living in Chicago last summer studying at the iO, i came to depend on the CTA (bus and rail). After reading about peak oil, I came to realize just how critical public transit (and support for it) is for all of us. Today I saw this in the Reader:

Year after year public transit authorities across this country struggle with budget shortfalls, service cuts and overall mismanagement. We have so subsidized the automobile, yet we demand mass rail and bus be “self sufficient.” Mass air travel, on the other hand, is free to seek government bailouts every 7 years or so. Car transportation benefits from the “free” road systems maintained by the government.
Back to Chicago. This ad really struck me as desperate. When the head of your public transit authority has to take out a full page ad in an alt weekly to announce fare increases, reduced service and beg the citizens to beg the legislature for more money, it is hard to find any source of faith in our society’s ability to adapt to an energy-poor future.
I wish my people in Chicago the best. Mostly i wish that through hardship they will find the anger and energy to prioritize more stable financing of the CTA. I also realize that it’s not all about money. Mis/management is a big problem with transit systems as today’s Chicago Tribune cover story suggests.
|